Re: [Planner Dev] Prop. for new feat. - second patch released

[Richard Hult <richard imendio com>]

Kurt Maute wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 08:36 +0100, Richard Hult wrote:
> 
> 
>>>I think we're talking about two different things.  As far as I can tell,
>>>the treeview rows line up with the task rows.  Its when you go to edit a
>>>task name or any other task value - the row height is enlarged but the
>>>edit box is not, so it looks like its floating at the top of the row
>>>(see attached pic).  I think the edit boxes just need to be enlarged to
>>>fit the row height.
>>
>>No, what I'm saying is that the treeview row height should not be
>>changed, it should be the height of the text. So the text should set the
>>row height, not the gantt bars. Or did I misunderstand what's happening?
> 
> 
> Well, then I guess the only alternative to increasing the row height
> would be to squish down the height of the gantt bars to make room for
> the nonstandard nonworking days visualization - right?

Yes, or to come up with some other way to draw them...

/Richard

-- 
Imendio AB, http://www.imendio.com/