Re: New dependency?

["Elijah Newren" <newren gmail com>]

On 6/7/06, Carlos Garnacho <carlosg gnome org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 11:07 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > I think we'll reach consensus that it's okay to use it: aren't we in
> > love with dbus now? ;-) Also, I'm a bit reluctant on imposing
> > restrictions on our blessed dependencies/external modules: we should
> > definitely tell their maintainers when we're not happy, but doing
> > more might not be sensible from us.
> >
> > Now, what about liboobs? :-) I guess it should be included in the
> > desktop set.
>
> Indeed, when I feel more confident about it's API stability, I may
> propose it formally for the developer platform.
>
> BTW, g-s-t will very probably depend soon on PolicyKit (a dependency
> recently introduced by HAL), I initially thought it wouldn't be an
> issue, but now I'm not so sure... should I have notified this too? :)

PolicyKit used to be part of HAL, so it's somewhat of a special case;
there's no new code we're depending on, just a splitting of the
codebase that we depended on.