Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Idea for simplifying development



I tend to agree. Some method of sources-plugins is needed and will
surely improve RhythmBox.

Yo'av,


On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:53:55 -0500, Brian Fahrlander
<brian fahrlander net> wrote:
> 
>     How about this for an idea?
> 
>     "Radio", "Library" and "Ipod" stays part of the mainline code; let's
> face it, these are biggies.  But how much grief will it be to allow
> plugins at _that_ point.  Like, one written by someone else named
> "Shoutcast" that will operate under slightly different rules?
> 
>     I'm just thinking that this will allow features to be added to the
> collective, in an optional way.  If a plugin doesn't work out, no
> biggie- the main code stays clean.  And, you guys can concentrate on
> central issues like having a way to play various formats, and deal with
> the local library in a solid, sane way.
> 
>     Hmm.  Imagine for a moment..."remote" libraries...nah. I don't have
> the network background (in programming) to pull something like that
> off.)
> 
>     Just an idea.
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Brian Fahrländer                  Christian, Conservative, and Technomad
> Evansville, IN                                 http://www.fahrlander.net
> ICQ 5119262
> AIM: WheelDweller
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rhythmbox-devel mailing list
> rhythmbox-devel gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
> 
> 
> 
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]