Re: Registering your arch archives Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Storage based mp3 players

[Sriram Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com>]

It's more of bookkeeping.  I expect people to put patches and
everything in bugzilla.  This more of, "hey I implemented this
thing can someone test it?"  But if we are moving away from all that
I'm groovy with that and we can remove it.

Otherwise, I agree that the canonical spot is in CVS and people should
get their fix from there..

sri


On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:06:27PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 23:48 +0200, Jaap Haitsma wrote:
> > Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> > > Yeah, sorry I didn't do that.  
> > > 
> > > If you have an arch repository please mention it in  the wiki:
> > > 
> > > http://live.gnome.org/RhythmboxContrib
> > > 
> > > I didn't add branch name which I should probably do.  Since most of us
> > > have a lot of branches.
> > > 
> > > Also, it would be nice to switch to bazaar instead of tla since it's
> > > a lot easier to use for newer contributors. :-)  But no biggie if
> > > you don't.
> > > 
> > > Bazaar is located in: http://bazaar.canonical.com/
> > > 
> > > (or apt-get install bazaar if you're on debian type systems)
> > > 
> > 
> > Since the main archive now is in CVS wouldn't it be a better idea to 
> > refer new users to CVS.
> > 
> > The way I see it now (as an outsider, so I might be terribly wrong) is 
> > that having all these different archives with different functionality 
> > and patches is costing Bastien and Christophe a lot of extra time. I 
> > guess that for stability it would also be better if more people used the 
> > version in CVS.
> 
> I completely agree with Jaap. Feel free to do versioning system tests,
> but do that away from Rhythmbox. We ended up with 9 months of backlog,
> and it's hard enough tracking Rhythmbox as it is.
> 
> ---
> Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> 
> 

--