Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Initial rating of new songs
- From: Nico Kaiser <nico kaiser gmail com>
- To: James Livingston <jrl ids org au>
- Cc: rhythmbox-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Initial rating of new songs
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:37:02 +0200
Hi!
2005/10/25, James Livingston <jrl ids org au>:
> So what do you think about setting the "2.5" value to "0" in
> rhythmdb.c?
Personally, I think that having them being "unrated" rather than rated
at 2.5 is more useful, especially since there is currently no way to
create a playlist of unrated songs. If we change this back, we probably need to do the following:
* make sure that play orders that use ratings treat 0 the same as 2.5
* make it so that you can create playlists based on being unrated
* be able to unrate songs
Is "2.5" saved in the database? I think it's replaced by "2" after a restart but I may be wrong.
With 0 as "unrated", even sorting/auto-playlists work:
- "Rating is at most 3" displays 3*, 2*, 1* and unrated(0*) songs, which is ok in my opinion
- You can easily adjust auto-playlists that used to play "at least 2*"
songs (and thus new songs with 2.5*), only add a line "rating is 0".
- It would be nice if no stars (small stars) would be shown if rating=0
Maybe the small stars should generally only be shown on hover, I think iTunes and WMP do this.
Nico.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]