Re: Started adding GObject signals to gnome-class

[Sebastian Dröge <slomo coaxion net>]

On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 12:15 +0300, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 10:20 +0300, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> > > > Things to come:
> > > > - Some GObject interface
> > >
> > > Yes, please!  I'm thinking that right now we have
> > >
> > > gobject_gen! {
> > >     class Foo: Parent {
> > >         ...
> > >     }
> > > }
> > >
> > > should we also allow "interface" as well as "class" in there?
> >
> > Definetely! And similar to traits, you can have default
> > implementations for the interface methods or leave them
> > unimplemented.
>
> Oh and interfaces can also have properties (to be
> implemented/overridden by implementors) and signals.

An interface (Nameable) with a default implementation for its virtual
method is there too now, an two boxed types. One refcounted, one
copied. Both are basically Option<String> and opaque from the outside,
if you need non-opaque boxed types you would have to use #[repr(C)]
structs but that's otherwise all the same.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part