> It is then even more necessary to note how pointless it is to blindlyAh, you mean like not allowing to pause/fast forward videos when
> obey such specification, when it is possible that at least three major
> manufacturers obtained certification based on it, while there devices
> are not implementing it.
DLNA.ORG_OP is missing, like ehm Samsung does, for example?
Because UPnP uses HTTP quite a lot and so reuses the User-Agent (and
Server) header for this.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674736 now has a patch that
should ignore seeks based on user-agent.
Yes. And in fact to some degree that was intentional by DLNA. Some
devices are not meant to work together without a third one.