Re: The sound of silence :-(
- From: David Mosberger <davidm napali hpl hp com>
- To: Eric Mangold <teratorn world-net net>
- Cc: David Mosberger <davidm napali hpl hp com>, sawfish-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: The sound of silence :-(
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:22:17 -0800
Eric,
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 21:25:35 -0700, Eric Mangold <teratorn world-net net> said:
>> I noticed that with sawfish on GNOME2, resizing the Emacs window
>> will cause it to display a geometry-spec that's off by 4 for the
>> width of the window. For example, if I want the Emacs window to
>> be 80 columns wide, I have to size it to be 84 columns wide (as
>> per geometry info displayed by sawfish). This used to work just
>> fine under GNOME1. It appears that only Emacs is affected.
>> Resizing of, say, an xterm window works just fine. Anybody else
>> seen anything similar?
Eric> I can reproduce this with emacs but not with xemacs nor
Eric> anything else I've tried. Using gnome2 doesn't make a
Eric> difference. icewm shows the correct horizontal
Eric> dimension. Hmmm.. I don't have any idea why :)
Yes, I don't see the problem with other programs either. I don't know
about xemacs, but xterm is also OK. But I don't think the problem is
with emacs per se. I know it used to work fine with emacs21 from
Debian/stable and I just tried downgrading to it and it also shows the
"bad text width" problem.
I dug some more and it's getting rather more bizarre: the problem
seems to be triggered by using a geometry of 80x46-0-0. The last -0
is the important one here. If I change the geometry to 80x46-0-1, the
text width comes out correct! To be clear,
this command gets the bad width display: emacs -geometry 80x46-0-0
this command gets the good width display: emacs -geometry 80x46-0-1
I thought the problem might be due to gnome-panel. However, if I do:
$ Xnest -ac :1 &
$ DISPLAY=:1 sawfish &
$ DISPLAY=:1 emacs -geometry 80x25-0-0
The width display is also bad.
On the other hand, if I do "xterm -geometry 80x25-0-0" there is no problem.
Anybody have an idea where this might be coming from?
--david
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]