Am Dienstag, den 20.10.2009, 09:40 -0500 schrieb Jeremy Hankins: > Jeremy Hankins <nowan nowan org> writes: > > What's proper behavior when maximizing a window that's across two > > viewports? Should it: > > > > 1) maximize into the viewport of it's position -- i.e., of its upper > > left corner? (Or of its gravity-determined corner?) > > > > 2) maximize into the current viewport? Presumably not unless at least > > one of the viewports it is currently visible from is the currently > > active viewport, so what about when it's not visible at all? Fall > > back to #1? > > > > 3) maximize into the viewport it's mostly in -- so if it's 30% in one > > and 70% in the other the 70% viewport gets the window. That still > > leaves 50/50 cases, of course -- presumably this would fall back to > > #1 or #2. > > After having thought about this some more I decided that #3 with a > fallback to #1 is the best option. #2 is bad because it makes it > unpredictable where the window will maximize since it depends on which > viewport is active. #1 is bad because the typical case is probably > where a window is just a few pixels into the next viewport over -- a > viewport with just a few pixels of a window is definitely not the > viewport the window is in. > +1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil