Re: python / tinymail.Account.set_pass_func

[Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>]

Note that at some point I want to migrate to the style that GIO uses for
asynchronous APIs. I don't think this is done using closures either.

And given that GIO is in glib, I think that methodology will sooner or
later become a standard for asynchronous apis in glib.

Which means that binding tools will probably automatically cope with it
too.

On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 13:26 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 12:18 +0100, Mark Doffman wrote:
> 
> > Ideally all callback functions in the tinymail interface would use 
> > GClosures, as this would be trivial to bind to. Failing that
> > providing 
> > user data associated with each callback would make binding by hand 
> > possible.
> 
> I wouldn't be against a tny-closures.h and tny-closures.c that wraps all
> callback APIs into ones that are done with closures.
> 
> 
-- 
Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be 
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org 
http://pvanhoof.be/blog
http://codeminded.be