Re: [Tracker] trackerd consuming "too much" memory
- From: "Fabrizio Listello" <flistellox gmail com>
- To: jamie <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk>
- Cc: tracker-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Tracker] trackerd consuming "too much" memory
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 13:56:35 +0100
Bad news.
I've just installad r1057 and I've a similar situation:
8366 user 34 19 346m 256m 3704 S 0.0 26.2 1:23.08 trackerd
7684 root 15 0 333m 115m 7892 S
0.0 11.8 18:56.95 X
27208 user 15 0 235m 103m 26m S 0.0 10.6 1:46.05 firefox-bin
9442 user 15 0 227m 85m 22m S 0.0 8.7
4:45.08 thunderbird-bin
2106 user 15 0 458m 68m 37m S 0.0 7.0 4:38.20 soffice.bin
On Dec 5, 2007 3:23 PM, jamie <
jamiemcc blueyonder co uk> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 14:50 +0100, Fabrizio Listello wrote:
> Hi all on the list,
> I'm using Tracker version 0.6.3 on my Gentoo GNU/Linux laptop and I'm
> seeing a weird amount of memory consumed by the tracker daemon.
> As one of the objectives of tracker is the "small footprint" I think
> we should examine the problem.
> Here is a couple of rows taken from 'top', ordered by %MEM:
>
> top - 14:37:23 up 5:02, 4 users, load average: 1.52, 1.66, 1.57
> Tasks: 119 total, 2 running, 117 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> Cpu(s): 2.8%us, 12.5%sy, 47.2%ni, 0.0%id, 37.5%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si,
> 0.0%st
> Mem: 1002440k total, 988740k used, 13700k free, 15728k
> buffers
> Swap: 337356k total, 214728k used, 122628k free, 188932k
> cached
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+
> COMMAND
> 11980 user0001 34 19 419m 294m 3540 S 0.0 30.1 1:09.13
> trackerd
> 9217 user0001 15 0 307m 142m 23m R
0.0 14.5 18:00.48
> firefox-bin
> 7724 root 15 0 296m 72m 7852 S 1.4 7.4 29:14.53
> X
> 4569 user0001 15 0 414m 67m 43m S 0.0 6.9 0:07.92
> soffice.bin
> 1134 user0001 15 0 178m 57m 22m S
0.0 5.9 1:15.53
> thunderbird-bin
> 8880 user0001 39 19 106m 31m 9896 S 0.0 3.2 9:15.90
> beagled-helper
> 5642 beaglein 39 19 67700 29m 8128 D 59.7 3.1 8:21.90
> beagle-build-in
>
> As you can see both VIRT and RES are very very high, for example they
> are higher than program well-known for their "excessive" use of
> memory. (..and much worse... it's higher than the indexer-cousin
> shaved-dog :)
>
>
mem leaks have been fixed already in svn
I assume you are using 0.6.3 which has this problem?
jamie
--
---
Faber
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]