Re: [Tracker] Disable indexing on NFS
- From: Philip Van Hoof <philip codeminded be>
- To: Martyn Russell <martyn lanedo com>, Philip Van Hoof <philip codeminded be>
- Cc: "janinko.g" <janinko g gmail com>, tracker-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Tracker] Disable indexing on NFS
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 13:36:55 +0200
Martyn Russell schreef op 16/09/2013 18:46:
[cut]
ps. If writing a patch to detect NFS mount points, the patch shouldn't
make it impossible to do so. As scanning NFS mount points ought to be a
possible use-case.
The question is really whether we consider ANY mount point. Currently
we index all mount points separately but we also coalesce them, e.g.
if we have:
/media/a
/media/b
both should be indexed. However, if we have:
/media/a
/media/a/nfs-mounted-location/
The second of the two should be consolidated into the first because
it's a parent of the second.
That's all fine - but what I think is happening here is we are
indexing $HOME and there is an nfs mount in $HOME/foo perhaps? It's
also quite possible that people mount other file system types in
$HOME/bar, etc. So the question becomes: do we want to have an option
to stay on the same file system or not - that should cover all NFS and
other file system type cases.
Thoughts?
I agree. No immediate thoughts from me on this. I'm guessing that if the
indexer is handling both right, the second pass over files of $HOME/foo
should cooperatively work against the first pass and the other way
around. But it's not ideal that a second pass happens in the first
place. I'm guessing some level of detecting this at configuration
parsing or at another later location in the FS miner wouldn't be the
worst idea.
Kind regards,
Philip
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]