Re: [Usability]Re: UI Review Summary - week 2
- From: Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>
- To: Mike Hearn <mike theoretic com>
- Cc: Shane OConnor - Sun Ireland <Shane Oconnor sun com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org, usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability]Re: UI Review Summary - week 2
- Date: 02 Dec 2002 19:49:19 +0000
Hey there,
> That's a good idea imho. I did try doing an independant UI review for
> file roller and posting it to the list, but nothing much came of it.
> Well, that's nice, but what we have this week is File Roller, and it
> needed an UI review. It wasn't very encouraging.
Yeah, sorry about that - I think the best plan would be to start putting
the suggestions in bugzilla as soon as possible [assuming that
file-roller now has a bugzilla component?]. Unfortunately I don't have
much of a say when it comes to usability, since I'm grossly unqualified
- it may be best adding usability-maint bugzilla gnome org to the cc
list in the bugzilla bug and also the documentation equivalent.
> I can't help but think that the current system doesn't scale terribly
> well. Shouldn't it be up to the software authors themselves to read the
> HIG and make their software compliant? Why does it have to be a group of
> people in IRC who do it?
Yes, unfortunately it is very much reliant on the time and effort of the
reviewers - in order for this to work, we really need a sane group of
people who have good knowledge of the HIG and documentation style guide.
This doesn't come easily. I think we need to rethink how we do this
stuff in the future - maybe we need to start thinking about having UI
reviews on a more regular basis...maybe we need to start thinking about
2.4 now?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]