Re: [Usability]prefs dialog recommendations
- From: Erik Pukinskis <erik pukinskis uconn edu>
- To: usability <usability GNOME ORG>
- Cc: Anna Dirks <anna ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Usability]prefs dialog recommendations
- Date: 17 Sep 2002 13:42:35 -0600
On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 10:09, Anna Dirks wrote:
> > 1) Users tend to not read large blocks of text.
> >
> > 2) These explanations disconnected from the functionality they describe,
> > making it unlikely users would find and use them at all.
>
> I honestly have no idea what you mean here. Can you provide any
> concrete examples for your assertions?
The first statement is a maxim from the book 'User Interface Design for
Programmers.' There's a good example of this on the author's site.[1]
In my experience users don't read dialogs like a book--they skim them,
searching for key terms that match their goal. Thus long explanatory
paragraphs are often simply overlooked.
The second point is that when faced with the following window:
-----------------------------------------
Prefences _ = x
-----------------------------------------
+ Appearance | Fonts
- Fonts |
- Colors | Serif [ Times ]
+ Advanced | Sans-serif [ Verdana ]
- Network |
- Filtering| [ ] Defibrillate fonts
- Cache |
|
-----------------------------------------
A user wouldn't think to click 'Appearance' to find out what
'Defibrillate fonts' means. There's nothing to suggest to them that
information would be there.
Erik
[1] http://www.joelonsoftware.com/uibook/chapters/fog0000000062.html
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]