Re: [Usability] remove vs delete
- From: "Mr. Shawn H. Corey" <shawnhcorey magma ca>
- To: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>
- Cc: usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability] remove vs delete
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:41:15 -0400
Shaun McCance wrote:
> This is, perhaps, not a clear-cut case. You can certainly add
> your account back by entering all the information anew. Then
> again, you can add back a file by entering all its contents
> from memory. I would tend to use "delete" only when actual
> user data is being lost, not just some configuration stuff.
>
> In the case of removing/deleting an account, I'd be worried
> that "delete" would carry the implication that the downloaded
> mail would disappear. With POP, that doesn't happen. With
> IMAP, the mail will disappear, but it's not really deleted.
> It's still on a server somewhere.
This is not a good example since user accounts are always removed, never
deleted. Think about it for a moment, it a user is deleted, his/her UID
will get reused. That means any files left on the system become assigned
to the new user; the new user can read files (or mail) left over from
before. This would be a security breach.
Adding your account back in after it has been removed means you get a
new UID, which means a new account; you can't read the old files or
mail. If you want your old account, it will have to be restored, not
"entered anew."
BTW, that was a hint, there should be a term for restoring anything that
was removed. I suggest "restore" :)
--
__END__
Just my 0.00000002 million dollars worth,
--- Shawn
"For the things we have to learn before we can do them, we learn by
doing them."
Aristotle
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]