Re: [Usability] Standard GUI recipes
- From: Calum Benson <Calum Benson Sun COM>
- To: Gnome usability <usability gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Usability] Standard GUI recipes
- Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 23:51:51 +0100
On 22 Jul 2006, at 09:10, brian muhumuza wrote:
On 7/12/06, Calum Benson <Calum Benson sun com> wrote:
On 12 Jul 2006, at 13:54, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> These are things the HIG currently doesn't cover because they're
more
> than one control, but (with the exception of progress windows) less
> than an entire window.
I've had definite plans to work on something like this for a while,
as part of (or supplemental to) a HIG revamp, and indeed I started
writing a mini-list of my own likely candidates here:
http://live.gnome.org/HumanInterfaceGuidelines?
action=show&redirect=HIG
i guess the best way to get this going is to work with GTK guys or
GNOME UI guys to create the widgets for programmers to use instead
of having to create them from scratch reading off a manual (HIG)
Possibly, but I'm not sure it's necessarily true for everything that
might end up on such a list. Ultimately, it doesn't really matter
how many fancy compound widgets you provide (and you can certainly
provide too many-- not that I'm suggesting we currently do), there's
always going to be a "next step up" in complexity where the developer
will have to write something from scratch to assemble them into
something useful, with guidance from some sort of HIG.
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:calum benson sun com Java Desktop System Team
http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771
Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]