On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 01:58 +0100, Martin wrote: > On Sat, 2007-12-02 at 21:26 +0000, Philip Withnall wrote: > > You can find a screenshot of the YouTube plugin at [1], and a screenshot > > of the Video Search (Tracker) plugin at [2]. Unfortunately, by reviewing > > via screenshot I think you miss the ability to review how usable loading > > extra results as you scroll is, so hopefully someone else on the list > > will be able to do that? > > I won't do an in depth review or anything but just noticed one thing > on the screenshots below that I find quite ironic. The local search > plugin has "Back" and "Forward" while the Youtube plugin doesn't. :) That's part of the point of the UI review --- we'd like to know which method is better from a usability viewpoint. Philip > I can imagine why web-based search tools have a need for "Back", > "Forward" and "Find" buttons (bandwidth concerns). It's harder to > justify for local search tools where searches should be fast enough > for "find as you type" and no "Back" and "Forward" buttons. > > > [1]: http://tecnocode.co.uk/totem-youtube.png > > [2]: http://tecnocode.co.uk/totem-video-search.png > > Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
