Re: [xml] XPath question
- From: Chris Burdess <dog bluezoo org>
- To: Igor Zlatkovic <igor zlatkovic com>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] XPath question
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 08:35:56 +0100
Igor Zlatkovic wrote:
Whoever produces XML of the sort
  ...
  <a xmlns="foo">
    <n/>
  </a>
  <a xmlns="bar">
    <n/>
  </a>
  ...
should be made aware of the fact that the thing cannot be processed 
efficiently. Using namespace prefixes solves this without changing 
anything about the data the document contains.
I don't understand how using namespace prefixes solves anything. For 
your example we can imagine an well-formed fragment
<x:a xmlns:x="foo:">
  <x:n/>
</x:a>
<x:a xmlns:x="bar:">
  <x:n/>
</x:a>
You still need to refer to the namespace URI (which, by the way, must 
be a URI unlike in your example) in order to differentiate the two 
instances of x:a.
--
Chris Burdess
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]   [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]   
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]