/ Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com> was heard to say:
| paphio:~ -> xsltproc --version
| Using libxml 20623-CVS2720, libxslt 10115-CVS1029 and libexslt 812-CVS1029
| xsltproc was compiled against libxml 20623, libxslt 10115 and libexslt 812
| libxslt 10115 was compiled against libxml 20623
| libexslt 812 was compiled against libxml 20623
Yes, with CVS from today:
$ xsltproc --version
Using libxml 20623-CVS2742, libxslt 10115-CVS1042 and libexslt 812-CVS1042
xsltproc was compiled against libxml 20623, libxslt 10115 and libexslt 812
libxslt 10115 was compiled against libxml 20623
libexslt 812 was compiled against libxml 20623
it all seems better. Thanks. I suppose I should bug-report this at
Ubuntu...
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw nwalsh com> | Whoever is abandoned by hope has also
http://nwalsh.com/ | been abandoned by fear; this is the
| meaning of the word "desperate."--
| Schopenhauer
Attachment:
pgpv40K0UHdet.pgp
Description: PGP signature