Re: [xml] RE: [xslt] small fix needed for win32

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 10:03:47AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard@redhat.com] 
> >   I'm tempted by an intermediate approach:
> >     - all source shipped as part of the distribution do 
> > #include "libxml.h"
> >       or "libxslt.h"
> >     - the files which are actually part of that library explicitely
> >       have #define IN_LIBXML before including it
> >     - the #define IN_LIBXML is removed from the header itself.
> 
> Likewise for IN_LIBXSLT

  yes,

> and IN_LIBEXSLT?

  I assume so, but I didn't looked at it closely. sounds it should be that
  way too, yes.

> And yes, this sounds ok to me.
> Of course, with automake 1.5 or above its easy in the Makefiles :].

Hum, no I really don't want to depend on a given version of the auto* tools.

> > P.S. I assume the last release didn't worked "out of the box" 
> > anyway since
> >      the new c14n module was added and I didn't integrated 
> > any patch from
> >      you about this ;-)
> 
> I haven't released new cygwin binaries, so you will get a patch when I
> do..

  Okay,

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@redhat.com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/