Re: [xslt] C++ bindings for libxslt
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: xslt gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xslt] C++ bindings for libxslt
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 05:30:58 -0500
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 06:16:14PM -0800, Peter Jones wrote:
> Hey, remember back when Daniel Veillard said:
> > Murray Cumming realized xmlwrapp existed *after* taking over libxml++
> > This doesn't necessarilly mean he doesn't want both to merge. Probably
> > not easy from a pure technical point of view though...
>
> In the end, I think that both libraries are good, because they give
> developers a choice. When libxml++ completes its transition to "one class
> per node type", the xmlwrapp and libxml++ interfaces will be different
> enough to cater to different developer styles.
hum, okay,
> BTW, thanks for updating the web site. I think the link on the FAQ page
> is broken, it is doubled. Could you also change my email address on the
> bindings page to xmlwrapp@pmade.org. Thanks.
done,
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]