I was probably a bit quick earlier. Apologies for the harsh message, but anyhow, I do feel that it would have been very appropriate that this either 1. gets ungnomed pretty quikcly, or 2. gets postponed until there has been a public discussion on the matter. Regards, Christoffer fre, 06.08.2004 kl. 11.02 -0400, skrev Owen Taylor: > On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 08:05, Christoffer Olsen wrote: > > If Srini is new, then he shouldn't have a CVS account at all - and > > according to our policies, he should not alter gnome.org. I went through > > the commits, and it seems he has done a few small patches (five I > > believe) for GNOME projects, which is a good thing. But I don't believe > > that he is "a useful and frequent contributor" [1] to the gnome.org > > website, and I don't believe he should be the one changing things. > > The standard policy for GNOME CVS is one where delegation is allowed. > Once Nat got permission from the web team to create the bounties > page, it was perfectly legitimate for him to turn over maintainence > to Srinivasa. > > The fact that that page doesn't convey the right message; that > it implies these bounties were decided by the GNOME project isn't a > problem with CVS commit rights, but rather a communication issue > at other levels. > > Regards, > Owen > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-list mailing list > foundation-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dette er en digitalt signert meldingsdel