Re: [PATCH] Re: Unread messages un-highlighted
- From: Jon Tai <jon tgpsolutions com>
- To: Peter Bloomfield <PeterBloomfield MindSpring com>
- Cc: Balsa list <balsa-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Unread messages un-highlighted
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 18:53:42 -0800
On 2001.12.18 16:23 Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> On 2001.12.18 18:27 Jon Tai wrote:
>> I have set my scan depth to 3, and I only have folders nested 2
>> layers deep. When I start balsa, the IMAP account is highlighted,
>> indicating messages. But when I expand the folder tree, there are
>> no mailboxes telling me where there are new messges. Only after
>> about half a minute do they appear.
>
> I can't explain that. On my setup, when I set the scan depth large
> enough, expanding or collapsing the IMAP tree is instant, and the
> highlighting is always consistent. When you write `there are no
> mailboxes telling me where there are new messages', do you mean that
> there are no mailboxes revealed, or that they are revealed but not
> highlighted?
>
> I guess this might be server-related: I'm using Cyrus, but I believe
> that others have tested the cvs code on uw-imap.
I meant that the mailboxes are there, they just aren't highlighted.
And I'm using UW-IMAP
>>
>> In balsa-1.2.3, as soon as mail was "checked" (the IMAP account
>> became highlighted) the mailboxes below it were highlighted showing
>> me where my new messages are. Using a new scanning method that
>> benefits people on slow connections is great, and I don't mind
>> dealing with a few development releases, but in the long run I don't
>> think balsa should penalize users on a fast connection with a
>> confusing "you have new messages, nevermind you don't (they
>> dissappeared), sorry you do after all" behavior. Other mail clients
>> I've seen handle this properly, and while balsa may not at the
>> present, I just want to ensure that it will eventually. - Jon
>
> Thanks--so do I!
>
> With a fast connection, is the repeated mail check implemented in my
> previous patch a nuisance?
>
The server is about 10 feet away from me, and the connection is
100megabit, so the double mail check is no problem, but like I said,
it's not a permanent solution. I don't know enough C to figure out why
the behavior has changed, but I think it would be great if this issue
was looked into by someone much more capable than I am for the
betterment of future versions of balsa.
- Jon
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]