Re: General Problems with Balsa
- From: Brian Stafford <brian stafford uklinux net>
- To: Carlos Morgado <chbm chbm nu>
- Cc: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: General Problems with Balsa
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:02:39 +0000
On Sun, 4 November 19:48 Carlos Morgado wrote:
> humm, does any other client work with this server ? my guess here is the
> message uidls aren't being seen correctly. i've seen this kind of thing
> happen with some servers if you delete from the mailbox. the pop server just
> rehashes all the uidls and breaks everything.
^^^^^^^^ assigns new?
RFC 1939 requires that the uid is persistent across sessions even if the
UPDATE command is not issued. Although it is not stated explicitly the
impliciation of this requirement is that for a given message the associated
uid MUST NOT change.
The uid is not required to be sequential and clients are required to handle
the situation where more than one identical copy of a message is in a maildrop
and had the same uid (this permits computing the uid as a hash of the message
content).
I conclude that the server behaviour described above is non-conformant.
Brian Stafford
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]