Re: Packaging Balsa 1.4 or 2.0 for Debian GNU/Linux
- From: Emmanuel <e allaud wanadoo fr>
- To: Andrew Lau <netsnipe debianplanet org>
- Cc: Carlos Morgado <chbm chbm nu>, balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Packaging Balsa 1.4 or 2.0 for Debian GNU/Linux
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 12:22:38 -0400
Le 2002.12.13 12:14, Andrew Lau a écrit :
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 10:17:05AM +0000, Carlos Morgado wrote:
> > in my opinion balsa1 should be brought up to 1.4 as it is much
> > better than 1.2 and there are still some bugs reported against 1.2
> > that don't exist on 1.4.
>
> Hi Carlos,
> What I'm asking is whether Debian should have both Balsa 1.4
> and 2.0 packages in the unstable distribution as GNOME 1.4 is no
> longer the default GNOME desktop now. So please advise me which option
> I should take.
>
> 1) Update the current balsa package from 1.2 to 1.4
> AND release a separate balsa2 package for 2.0.3.
>
> OR
>
> 2) Update the current balsa package from 1.2 to 2.0.
>
> I hope this clears things up.
I guess that for unstable packaging only balsa-2.0.x is OK (it has the
same feature, and should be as stable as 1.4).
Bye
Manu
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]