Re: Suggestions to Balsa again

[Jose Fonseca <j_r_fonseca yahoo co uk>]

On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 15:29, Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> On 2002.02.18 20:43 Jos? Fonseca wrote:
> [ snip ]
> > -Toggle:
> > 
> >  Instead of:
> > 
> >   |        |_________
> >   | Toggle | Flagged |
> >   |        | Unread  |
> >   |        |_________|
> >   |        |
> > 
> >  I would suggest:
> > 
> >   |                   |
> >   | Mark As Flagged   |
> >   | Mark As Unflagged |
> >   | Mark As Read      |
> >   | Mark As Unread    |
> >   |                   |
> 
> To keep the menu under control and the most likely choice at the top, 
> I'd suggest
> 
>    |           |___________
>    | Mark as > | Unread    |
>    |           | Read      |
>    |           | Unflagged |
>    |           | Flagged   |
>    |           |___________|
>    |           |
> 

Yes, it gives a much better organization indeed.

> You might also want to move `Undeleted' and `Deleted' here--certainly 
> above the flagged choices, and perhaps also above the read choices.
> 

Ok.

> And of course you'd want to scan the selected messages and omit any 
> choice that's impossible, regardless of whether they're in the main 
> menu or a submenu!

I'm not so sure of that... that could take some time for a big
selection, or is that information readily available for the message list
display?

Regards,

Jose Fonseca