> I don't see any xpms in that archive? Oh f*#&... fixed in the new patch below (don't use the first one, please...) > Another problem, not directly related, is that I cannot open the > archive via balsa, more precisely: file-roller says that. Saving it to > disk and opening it via nautilus works howver, so the handlers should > be ok. Bug? Does file-roller rely on extensions? Balsa stores temp files without any meaningful extension, which could explain the difference. However, IMHO apps should NOT use extensions (this is Winbloze crap) but gnome-vfs or file & friends to determine the content types. Cheers, Albrecht.
balsa-rfc3156-patch-2003-04-15a.bz2