Re: IMAP-problems

[Peter Bloomfield <PeterBloomfield bellsouth net>]

On 04/25/2003, Darko Obradovic wrote:
[ snip ]
> hmmm... no. :) I'd be completely happy with a total expansion of the 
> tree, as I have folders only for organizational issues and not to  
> hide masses of them I'd occasionally want to access. But I understand 
> the point very well, and most probably you're right there. But an 
> initial global expansion would be better than the current no 
> expansion at all imho. Any chance to patch that quickly and dirty? It 
> should be enough to point me to the code-section and tell me what 
> parameter of GTK_TREE_X affects that.

[ I wrote before, but with the wrong identity, and got wait-listed 
somewhere... ;-( ]

Q&D hack:

Index: src/mailbox-node.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/balsa/src/mailbox-node.c,v
retrieving revision 1.56
diff -u -r1.56 mailbox-node.c
--- src/mailbox-node.c	10 Mar 2003 03:54:46 -0000	1.56
+++ src/mailbox-node.c	25 Apr 2003 15:27:39 -0000
@@ -451,6 +451,7 @@
  	gnome_config_get_bool("ListInbox=true");      
gnome_config_pop_prefix();
  +    folder->expanded = TRUE;
      return folder;
  }
  @@ -1090,6 +1091,7 @@
      mbnode->name = g_strdup(basename);
      mbnode->parent = BALSA_MAILBOX_NODE(parent->data);
      mbnode->subscribed = mbnode->parent->subscribed;
+    mbnode->expanded = mbnode->parent->expanded;
      mbnode->scanned = isi->scanned;
      node = g_node_new(mbnode);