Re: [PATCH] replace icon list by tree view (was: UI Question/Suggestion)



Am 19.05.03 14:05 schrieb(en) Peter Bloomfield:
> That's right. If you want to act as soon as the user clicks on a row, 
> but not if the user changes the selection with the cursor keys, you need 
> to distinguish between key-press and button-press events in the 
> selection's "changed" handler.
> 
> Imho, it's simpler just not to respond to "changed", and instead wait 
> for "row-activated".

Hmmm, when I think again about this, I must admit that I have mixed 
feelings. It *is* indeed simpler to implement (it's ready, in other 
words), but it might confuse users if they can activate a mailbox and a 
message with a single click or move to the next message using the up/down 
arrows, but they have to double-click a part in the tree view (or hit 
space). (This was actually the reason I used "changed" as it confused me, 
but I'm sure others are more intelligent/flexible... ;-)) Does the HIG 
have some wisdom ready for this?

Opinions?

Cheers, Albrecht.

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  Albrecht Dreß  -  Johanna-Kirchner-Straße 13  -  D-53123 Bonn (Germany)
        Phone (+49) 228 6199571  -  mailto:albrecht.dress@arcor.de
_________________________________________________________________________

PGP signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]