Hey! I was thinking who you where, and then it just hit me :) John, can those GUI options become available in a separate package? Or else, is there a document detailing all config options in a non gui way (rather than having to read sawfish's source all the time? :)) Either's fine by me. On Wed, 2002-04-24 at 02:50, John Harper wrote: > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra writes: > |Now, first of all, I agree that we can have a simpler window manager for > |less experienced users (I think that sawfish in novice mode is quite > |enough, but I don't have anything against having two choices) and > |metacity does that job well. However, there's no need to cripple > |sawfish. > Just about all the options (except the most bizarre) are still there, > but they're not exposed through the user interface any more. ok > | > |Two things I consider very bad decisions: > | - removal of different levels of configuration > user-levels didn't really work, one had to enable the higher levels to > make common changes. (This couldn't be solved just by moving options > around.) BTW, why? > | - removal of viewports. > they're not removed, just hidden from view. You can do: > (setq viewport-dimensions '(6 . 1)) > (setq customize-command-classes '(default viewport)) Okay, then may I ask why? Viewports present a better behaviour than workspaces (* in sawfish at least *). You could always remove workspaces, and rename viewports to workspaces, right? > to set your desktop to 6x1 and put the viewport commands back into the > bindings panel. > (though I may change customize-command-classes to something shorter) erms... like I said, is there a document explaining that? Hugs, rms -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi + So let's do it...?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part