Re: A Violent Realisation [Was: Preferences]
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: A Violent Realisation [Was: Preferences]
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 01:09:52 +1000
<quote who="James Henstridge">
> By removing one of the options, you are going to piss some people off.
Perhaps they can happily live together...
Consider three layouts: vertical, horizontal and grid. For both vertical and
horizontal, Next and Previous seem appropriate. For grid, N-S-E-W seems more
appropriate. But they can be combined.
North, South, East (as Next), West (as Previous) navigation results in
left-to-right and top-to-bottom cyclical navigation for horizontal and
vertical layouts, and up-down-left-right navigation for grid layouts.
Only four key bindings to provide both navigation mechanisms.
[ This doesn't even approach the topic of windows sitting across
boundaries or things like that, though. I'm not sure what the arguments
against that are. ]
So,
_
|_| next goes down
|_| prev goes up
|_| next/prev at the top and bottom cycle
_____
|_|_|_| next goes right, prev goes left, next/prev at each end cycles
_____
|_|_|_| next goes right, prev goes left
|_|_|_| up goes up, down goes down
|_|_|_| next at the end goes up to the left of the next row, down goes
to the top of the next row (and vice versa)
> People who prefer workspaces are obviously on crack.
[ Ahem. I agree, but prefer to use the following phrasing: "The people who
prefer having only the functionality provided by what we used to call
'workspaces' are obviously on crack." :-) ]
- Jeff
--
"I came for the quality, but I stayed for the freedom." - Sean Neakums
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]