Re: The whole panel focus/keynav thing

[Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>]

On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 16:30, Bill Haneman wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 20:33, Seth Nickell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 06:37, Bill Haneman wrote:
> > > Padraig/All:
> > > 
> > > I don't think we should make such a statement without further
> > > researching the issues here.
> > 
> > Yes we should. This close to release we should have backed the change
> > out a few days ago. It can be added back in if it can be made to work.
> > We shouldn't have regressions / new brokenness, period. Its not
> > difficult to add the changes in again if they can be made to work
> > smoothly. I don't see why that is not the automatic model we should be
> > following here ?!?
> > 
> > That said, I would be much more comfortable if the changes would be run
> > by a release team member before they are committed since they *have* a
> > history of breaking things.
> 
> The patch was posted for comments for over a week (maybe two) before
> being committed.  RT members *were* consulted.

Forgive me if I missed it, but searching through archives of the release
team list I don't see any mention of this patch.

-Seth