Re: gnome-vfs and Gnome2.2?

[Alex Graveley <alex ximian com>]

Hi,

I fixed this a few hours after sending my original mail.  Gnome-vfs
trunk should be up to date and buildable.

Sorry to leave everyone hanging, I've been moving and away from
internet.

-Alex

On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 10:49, Joe Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 07:18, Michael Meeks wrote:
> 
> > 	There is a great danger in branching too early, hacking frantically,
> > and then wandering off - it makes life painful for all involved ;-)
> > 
> > 	Ultimately - who is going to do the work to turn HEAD into a releasable
> > package, etc.
> 
> This is my main concern as well.  Commits to HEAD by the maintainers
> seem few and far between with large, sweeping changes when they do land
> that make merging between branches needlessly complicated.  Perhaps more
> distressing is that potential contributors on the gnome-vfs list are
> looking for guidance from the maintainers and not getting any feedback
> whatsoever.  (see for reference the ftp module and ACL discussions)
> 
> I'm not trying to rag on the maintainers, but we all need a little more
> guidance on the state of the module and its future.  As mentioned
> before, the last time this came up, if gnome-vfs HEAD is to be used for
> GNOME 2.2, it should always be building and functionally working. 
> Judging from Alex's post, this isn't the case.
> 
> Joe
> 
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
-- 
 on the canvass of life, incompetence is my paintbrush.