On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 07:49, Joe Shaw wrote: > This is my main concern as well. Commits to HEAD by the maintainers > seem few and far between with large, sweeping changes when they do land > that make merging between branches needlessly complicated. Perhaps more > distressing is that potential contributors on the gnome-vfs list are > looking for guidance from the maintainers and not getting any feedback > whatsoever. (see for reference the ftp module and ACL discussions) > > I'm not trying to rag on the maintainers, but we all need a little more > guidance on the state of the module and its future. As mentioned > before, the last time this came up, if gnome-vfs HEAD is to be used for > GNOME 2.2, it should always be building and functionally working. > Judging from Alex's post, this isn't the case. Both Seth and I are finding that we don't have as much time to devote to gnome-vfs as we would like. I was going to get patches integrated from bugzilla this weekend, but as always it just didn't happen. I'll try to get some patching done in between compiles at work today - we'll see how that goes. I have no idea what the state of the 2.0.3 release is, so I'll work in my local tree till thats thats out. Alex? Seth? Can you update the list with whats up there? Anythink I can do to help out? Ian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part