Re: Minutes for G2 release team meeting 2002-09-04
- From: Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas apestaart org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Minutes for G2 release team meeting 2002-09-04
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 17:41:22 +0200 (CEST)
> DONE: Frederic to write GEP (Gnome enhancement procedure) for
> release-consistent version numbering changes.
> => Now in CVS as cvs/gep/proposals/gep-4.html
> Discussion period for it ends 27th September 2002
Read through it, looks good.
One change (maybe it's not a change but the intent of the text already)
I'd like to propose is :
* when first release candidate of 2.2 is released, modules are
versioned as 2.1.90.T
I think that when we decide to release an RC1 in the near future, all of
the modules should be versioned 2.1.90.T.
So the "90", IMO, should be used for modules *before* going into RC1, and
after releasing RC1, we should use "91".
For those curious, I asked Frédéric why he used 90, and he said that he
wants to allow for more than one RC, but not more than 9 ;) Which is a
good point.
Other than that, looks good. Maybe a sample timeline of a project could
be added to make it just a little clearer. This is the sort of stuff you
don't want to have to think hard about when you want to do a release ;)
Thomas
--
The Dave/Dina Project : future TV today ! - http://davedina.apestaart.org/
<-*- -*->
And discover your lover
Between the legs of another
And he's loving it
<-*- thomas apestaart org -*->
URGent, the best radio on the Internet - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.rug.ac.be/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]