Re: omf files that dont validate

[Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>]

On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 10:46, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> Le ven 20/09/2002 à 06:11, Malcolm Tredinnick a écrit :
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 04:55:02AM +0100, mike wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 04:33, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 04:17:50AM +0100, mike wrote:
> > > > > Does anyone know whether there are any alternate dtds that take account
> > > > > of omf files that do not validate such as glade or evolution
> > > > 
> > > > What do you mean by "take account of"?
> > > > 
> > > > There should only be one DTD for the OMF files we use. If an XML file
> > > > does not validate against that it is not an OMF file, so I am a bit
> > > > worried by the possibility of multiple DTDs.
> > > 
> > > I understand this but what do we do about apps (mainly 1.4 but some 2.x
> > > apps like gnomedb and glade) which do not validate. This is the error
> > > output from scrollkeeper-update -p
> > 
> > We fix them; they are broken. I thought I had already filed bugs against
> > gnomedb and glade, but looking for them now, I cannot find them -- so I
> > must have been hallucinating.
> 
> I have done a lot of fixes for OMF files for Mandrake Linux 9.0.. Should
> I commit them directly or should I send them to maintainers ?
> 
if you've got fixes for either libgda, libgnomedb or mergeant, then,
please, send me the patches.

cheers