Re: omf files that dont validate



On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 06:11, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 04:55:02AM +0100, mike wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 04:33, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 04:17:50AM +0100, mike wrote:
> > > > Does anyone know whether there are any alternate dtds that take account
> > > > of omf files that do not validate such as glade or evolution
> > > 
> > > What do you mean by "take account of"?
> > > 
> > > There should only be one DTD for the OMF files we use. If an XML file
> > > does not validate against that it is not an OMF file, so I am a bit
> > > worried by the possibility of multiple DTDs.
> > 
> > I understand this but what do we do about apps (mainly 1.4 but some 2.x
> > apps like gnomedb and glade) which do not validate. This is the error
> > output from scrollkeeper-update -p
> 
> We fix them; they are broken. I thought I had already filed bugs against
> gnomedb and glade, but looking for them now, I cannot find them -- so I
> must have been hallucinating.
>
AFAIK, you didn't for gnome-db

cheers




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]