Re: Structure in $HOME
- From: Dave Bordoley <bordoley msu edu>
- To: Rui Miguel Seabra <rms 1407 org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Structure in $HOME
- Date: 17 Jan 2003 10:09:41 -0500
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 05:26, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 04:22:39PM +0000, Sander Vesik wrote:
> > Well, there is no essential difference a 'nonsense name' and a 'unlocalised
> > english name' if you don't speak English. But /usr, /bin, /etc and similar
> > directories are probbaly not something a normal users should even have to know
> > about and so it doesn't really matter what they are called.
>
> Not normal, please, I'm a perfectly normal user[1].
> Those users who should never have to care about that are the _begginers_
> or very basic users.
>
> As you get to know your system, the power of the shell and the thousands
> of commands with one for almost anything you need, you inevitably have
> to know (and care) about /usr, /dev, etc...
>
> For the sanity of basic users, they should be masked from this but
> this thread is starting to sound a little strange[2]... let's change the
> whole LSB, while we're about it ;)
>
Well if your in to vaporware LinuxSTep is attempting this by creating a
linux based OS that completely ignores, among other things, the
established unix file system hierarcy.
dave
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]