Re: Shouldn't we umm start a second volume?

On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 01:39, Rich Burridge wrote:
> This is not exactly desktop-devel related but I noticed that the latest
> digest is:
>    desktop-devel-list digest, Vol 1 #1377 - 7 msgs
> Time to start a new volume? Or does some epoch shattering event have
> to occur for this to happen?

I think we're going to get a new volume when:
 * RMS starts using non-free software
 * ddl stops being the ground for new holy wars (galeon vs. epiphany
 * The "issue" counter overflows at 2^32



Robert Mibus <mibus bigpond com>

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]