On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 05:43, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote: > > From: Luis Villa [mailto:louie ximian com] > > I'm not very > > comfortable with it either- it puts too much power in the hands of a > > small group of fairly inbred people who have fairly set ways > > of looking > > at the GNOME world. Problem being I'm not sure how else to do it. > > Really, it's the problem with all GNOME decisions and > > actions- it boils > > down to someone taking some type of initiative and doing it, > > and that's > > frequently not the best way to do things. > > Could we agree this after the imminent GNOME 2.4 new modules freeze? I don't > think we've failed yet. Err, isn't this 4+ weeks away yet? According to http://www.gnome.org/start/2.3/, I see June 9 Feature & API/ABI freeze Desktop and platform release module additions are finalised, major feature additions are listed. No new modules or features will be accepted for this release period. Or are you talking just about the dates that Luis put on GEP 11, which claim to have been pulled out of his ass? Greg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part