I think any rules should only apply to stable releases, and unstable
releases should avoid names in order to reduce clutter.
If you change it to:
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
"Proposed Release Naming Guidelines"
1 selection of stable release names should assume that names will
reflect on the perception of the GNOME platform, GNOME Foundation, and
its members.
2 stable release names should avoid words and phrases that are:
* likely to start a flamewar
* have high potential to cause offense (i.e contain sexual or
political references)
* obviously difficult to spell/pronounce [1]
3 stable release names should be posted to desktop-devel-list for
comment before adoption, and should conform to 1 and 2.
4 unstable releases should be nameless, using simply the version.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It is probably better even though it adds a point.
Hugs, Rui
[1] I agree with your uncertainty on this issue, following the rule "if
unsure don't", then probably it should not be there.
--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part