RE: Proposed: Evolution (and associated libs)

[Chipzz <chipzz ULYSSIS Org>]

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Chipzz wrote:

> I'm against removing gal in the 2.6 timeframe, you guys should probably
> look at what widgets those apps are using and consider pushing them in-
> to some other library (because I think there are quite some potentially
> usefull widgets in gal, which other apps could benefit from), and remo-
> ve gal in the 2.8 timeframe.

Also, as I understand it, some widgets in gal were extensions to exis-
ting widgets in other libraries. Maybe you guys should look into push-
ing some of those "upstream"?

kr,

Chipzz AKA
Jan Van Buggenhout
-- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 UNIX isn't dead - It just smells funny
                           Chipzz ULYSSIS Org
------------------------------------------------------------------------