Re: GLF- Gnome Lockdown Framework
- From: arch enterprise hb se
- To: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- Cc: "desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GLF- Gnome Lockdown Framework
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:57:41 +0100
> Desktop lockdown has been discussed previously on this list (google for
> the discussion), and some people have already added gconf keys for this
> and started implementing it.
>
I'm well aware that lockdown features have been previously discussed and
declared as somehing that is *needed* (see eg
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2003-October/msg00357.html),
but there seems to be no *framework* or *standards* settled. Concerning
implementations, are they done with a policy tool in mind that allows for
setting per-group, per-user or default policies/permissions? Are there any nifty
APIs
available for finding all permissions for a user, based on default and group
permissions? Is the whole architecture thought through and settled?
This is where GLF comes in - as a standardized way for developers to publish and
interact with gconf in such a way that a policy tool can assign permissions
per-application, -user, -group and default, making it readable for the
API.
> Doing this as a project seemingly separate from Gnome sounds very
> strange.
Separate from Gnome? In that it is currently hosted on sourceforge, and not
cvs.gnome.org? Nothing stops it from being hosted on gnome.org if and when it
has been accepted, right? I just wanted some place to publish the idea at, and
sourceforge happened to be the first place that came to mind.
- Mikael
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]