Re: Proposal: replacing esound with polypaudio in 2.10
- From: danilo gnome org (Danilo Šegan)
- To: Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposal: replacing esound with polypaudio in 2.10
- Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 21:40:48 +0100
Today at 17:46, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Maw, 2004-11-02 at 00:27, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> You don't know libsamplerate, do you? libsamplerate provides multiple
>> resampling implementations. While all are fp, one does probably more
>> or less in fp what esd does in integer. (I haven't looked at the
>> resampling code of esound, I must admit, but it probably isn't much
>> worse than libsamplerate's SRC_ZERO_ORDER_HOLD.)
>
> In floating point they are *useless* on many platforms. You are talking
> 500 times slower than integer or worse if they are trapping to emulation
> of FPU units.
I see the point Alan is trying to make, but is this relevant for Gnome
adoption? I mean, on what machines is Gnome (especially 2.10)
actually usable which are not equipped with a FPU?
(Honest, I don't know, not trying to pick anybody up. I just had the
impression that Gnome mostly ran on machines where FPU is a standard,
but I never actually put any thought into it.)
Cheers,
Danilo
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]