Re: Proposed modules: my consensus so far

[Thomas Wood <thos gnome org>]

On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 11:00 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: 
> For the sake of discussion, this is what I think the consensus looks like
> so far [1]. But it's still early:
> http://www.gnome.org/start/2.9/#API_Freeze
> 

Was gnome-backgrounds left out on purpose? (proposal:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2004-
November/msg00162.html )

Or is this a case of [1]? ;-)

> For most of these modules, the maintainers need to take some action to
> convince us. We are not likely to approve stuff just because there are no
> objections, and not if there are lots of open questions.

There seemed to be a general consensus that the module should be
included.

> 
> All of the proposed module maintainers need to contact the usability,
> internationalization, documentation, and accessibility teams to get
> feedback where appropriate. It would make the release-team's job easier if
> they gave desktop-devel-list a little status report when they have done
> that.

i18n is being done (even though the gnome-background-properties doesn't
yet support it). Not quite sure whether documentation applies to this
module, but I will see what usability/accessibility teams have to say
about the current content.


-Thomas


> 
> [1] Remember, I am a muppet.
>