Re: Exciting GNOME?



On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 22:04 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote:
>>we should be looking at leapfrogging the current best effort [2], no 
>>matching it. :-)
>
>Fully agreed. That's how we should be thinking at all times. :)
>
>BTW, about the theme thing, I had a suggestion a few months ago:
>http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2004-September/msg00172.html 
>(which obviously need more work to smooth it out)
>Failing that, there's always this one: 
>http://www.resexcellence.com/themes/butt_osigh/mes/01-25_mes20050121_lg.jpg 
>;-) (joking, but it's interesting)

  I remember enjoying your mockup at the time, but commenting how
difficult it would be to code such a thing.  However, with the advent of
integrating gtk+ 2.8 with cairo, I think doing this becomes much easier,
and since cairo can have hardware acceleration, it could even be
fast! :-)

>
>Eugenia
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>desktop-devel-list mailing list
>desktop-devel-list gnome org
>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
-- 
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
<gjc inescporto pt> <gustavo users sourceforge net>
The universe is always one step beyond logic.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]