У Пнд, 2005-01-31 у 12:04 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero пише: > On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 14:17 +0100, Markus Bertheau ☭ wrote: > > > I understand that it would be better if all apps did not expose the > > implementation model of hard disk vs. RAM, but I don't understand why > > the behaviour described above should not be appropriate for the > > currently used model. Can you detail on this? > > You have two cases: > > 1. Already-saved documents with modifications > 2. Unsaved documents > > When you exit the program, you don't want it to automatically save (1) > to the existing filename since you may not want the document's changes > to be on your "final" on-disk version. Use the "Abandon changes" menu item mentioned in my other mail. Besides, non-techie computer users don't see the difference between the "on-disk" version and the "in-ram" version - the just took the document and edited it, now they're done and want to put it away. > For both cases, though, you may want to save to ~/.gnome2/tmp/myapp or > something, so that you can re-open those files when you restart the > program. The files would be deleted when you actually save the > documents to a "real" filename, or close them without saving. I imagine my mom, working in an office. She got sent a document by her boss. She opens it, changes it, closes the app. Next day she sends the document back to her boss. The boss gets an unchanged version back. I think that's confusing. The app should just save the document. I don't see what's bad with this. -- Markus Bertheau <twanger bluetwanger de>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: =?koi8-u?Q?=E3=C0?= =?koi8-u?Q?_=DE=C1=D3=D4=C9=CE=D5?= =?koi8-u?Q?_=D0=CF=D7=A6=C4=CF=CD=CC=C5=CE=CE?= =?koi8-u?Q?=D1?= =?koi8-u?Q?_=D0=A6=C4=D0=C9=D3=C1=CE=CF?= =?koi8-u?Q?_=C3=C9=C6=D2=CF=D7=C9=CD?= =?koi8-u?Q?_=D0=A6=C4=D0=C9=D3=CF=CD?=