Mono/GTK#/Tomboy
- From: David Neary <dneary free fr>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Mono/GTK#/Tomboy
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:59:59 +0200
Hi,
Elijah said:
> And the big question: We currently allow desktop modules to depend on
> the pygtk bindings, but no others. Should we extend that to include
> the gtk# ones (assuming, of course, that gtk# is added to the bindings set)?
Let me rephrase that question:
(Language X) is par of the bindings set. Should we consider that
applications written in (Language X) can be considered for the desktpo
release?
I think that should be the case. The bindings depend on the platform,
and I have no issue having Python, C++ or C# applications (or Java for
that matter, if java-gnome joins the bindings set) being considered for
inclusion in the desktop release (on condition that there is no
dependence on non-free software implied in that).
The desktop already depends on the presence of the bindings, so the only
question is whether GTK# is ready and willing to be in the bindings set
(or am I missing something?)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary
bolsh gimp org
Lyon, France
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]