Re: Mono/GTK#/Tomboy
- From: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Mono/GTK#/Tomboy
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:30:50 +0200
Le lundi 17 juillet 2006, à 10:12, JP Rosevear a écrit :
> On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 09:58 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 08:32 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > And while there were almost no objections to Python, there are clearly
> > > many objections to Mono.
> >
> > I used to have objections against the python bindings, but after those
> > got splitup in pygtk, gnome-python, gnome-python-desktop and
> > gnome-python-extras, I don't have big problems with it.
> >
> > Looking at mono, all of these bindings are in one package: gtk-sharp-2.
> > I think, to get mono as accepted binding language, we should have a
> > splitup similiar to the splitup that has been done to the python
> > bindings.
>
> This is really just a packaging issue, on opensuse/SLED they are all
> individual packages (glib-sharp, gtk-sharp, etc).
How do we deal with the tarballs on the ftp servers? (there's no
packages there). We only want the supported bindings in
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/bindings/2.x/2.x.y/sources/
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]