Re: focus!

[Brian Nitz <Brian Nitz Sun COM>]

Do we know what level of accessibility is possible within the current 
mono framework?
Do we know what level of accessibility is likely (e.g. with C# apps 
ported from other platforms?)

Bill Haneman wrote:
> Federico said:
>
>   
> > Big tangent:  the "GNOME Certification" plan will help in defining what
> > is a "good GNOME application" and what isn't.  That certification will
> > include things like consistent look&feel [insert a lot of handwaving
> > about how to quantify this...]
> >     
>
> /me points to 
> Gnome Accessibility Guide For Developers,
> http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gap/guide/gad , and 
> Testing Gnome Applications for Accessibility:
> http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gap/testing/index.html
>
>
> Bill
>
>   
> >   Federico
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 01:07:57 +0200
> > From: Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>
> > Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Memory consumption and virtual
> > 	machines
> > To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
> > Message-ID: <1153264077 5450 86 camel localhost localdomain>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 16:05 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> >     
> > > On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 14:46 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > >       
> > > I've been talking to Philip on IRC, and gave him these requirements for
> > > his patch:
> > >
> > > 1. Don't change the external ABI of Camel, so that Evo needs no changes,
> > > *OR* also submit a patch to update Evo for the changed API.
> > >       
> > Achieved
> >
> >     
> > > 2. Make sure the summary format on disk works with older Evos without
> > > making *them* rewrite the summaries.  This is for deployments which have
> > > machines with old and new versions of GNOME, but NFS homedirs accessible
> > > from any machine.
> > >       
> > Achieved my renaming all the summary filenames
> >
> >     
> > > 3. Keep the coding style, variable naming convention, indentation, etc.
> > >       
> > Done
> >
> >
> > For you, attached and on a plate:
> >
> >         o. The patch for evolution-data-server
> >         o. The patch for evolution-exchange
> >
> >
> > Trying to get this upstream is, for me, saying thank you.
> >
> > Looking at the patch technically AND testing it (and if it doesn't
> > perform, giving me numbers that compare it with the original implement-
> > ation) is all I'm asking for.
> >
> > If Novell wants me to implement unit tests (or other tests) for this, I
> > will ask for payment.
> >
> > --
> > Philip Van Hoof, software developer at x-tend 
> > home: me at pvanhoof dot be 
> > gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org 
> > work: vanhoof at x-tend dot be 
> > http://www.pvanhoof.be - http://www.x-tend.be
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > Name: evolution_data_server__mmap_summary.diff.gz
> > Type: application/x-gzip
> > Size: 14012 bytes
> > Desc: not available
> > Url : /archives/desktop-devel-list/attachments/20060719/9407295b/attachment.bin 
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > Name: evolution_exchange__mmap_summary.diff.gz
> > Type: application/x-gzip
> > Size: 871 bytes
> > Desc: not available
> > Url : /archives/desktop-devel-list/attachments/20060719/9407295b/attachment-0001.bin 
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > desktop-devel-list mailing list
> > desktop-devel-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
> >
> > End of desktop-devel-list Digest, Vol 27, Issue 65
> > **************************************************
> >     
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>